Opera is better in CSS2 than Mozilla

[Ezh]

http://www.xs4all.nl/~ppk/css2tests/intro.html

Look at this table.

[mfk]

Looks like his tests were flawed.

"Proprietary syntax" to choose between the W3C and MS DOM?

[clav]

"Proprietary syntax" to choose between the W3C and MS DOM?

it says "Proprietary syntax" to choose between the standard (W3C) box model and the one IE5 and earlier used

this is not related to DOM

[michel v]

Most CSS2 tests are hardly real life example of webpages.
That said, Mozilla hardly has anything to envy to Opera: the counter property, and what else?

[Shark Daddy]

In any case, you'd exect Opera to have really good CSS support considering the creator of CSS is a major Opera player.

[mfk]

In any case, you'd exect Opera to have really good CSS support considering the creator of CSS is a major Opera player.

Too bad all versions of Opera up through 6 had marginal CSS support. Just because the creator's part of the W3C doesn't guarantee standards compliance.

[velociraptor]

Mozilla has still shortcomings, Mozilla should get better. What else can one say?

[Shark Daddy]

Too bad all versions of Opera up through 6 had marginal CSS support. Just because the creator's part of the W3C doesn't guarantee standards compliance.

Opera attributes this to the shortcomings of their first engine. I don't think I buy that though...